Research shows that room-based video conferencing is much
more common than its desktop counterpart.
According to the May 2011 InformationWeek Desktop Video
Conferencing Survey, 34% of respondents had desktop video conferencing system
deployed with an extra 10% saying they were planning to do the same over the
following 12 months. The same poll showed that 78% of the respondents had
already implemented a room-based video conferencing system, even though these
are usually more expensive and difficult to use.
Still, desktop video conferencing adoption seems to be
growing, and could, in a near future, take over room-based video conferencing.
Room-based video conferencing is tied to management and
employee training. It’s great and very important to have a room where one can
have a meeting with a possible partner or a client through video, or a place
where employees can attend seminars without having to leave their office.
But desktop video conferencing, which can be deployed on
every computer without the need of a specific space, can be very useful in a
working environment and increase productivity substantially. By deploying and
implementing a unified communications system, which includes desktop video
conferencing, collaboration among employees and between employees and
management will increase considerably.
When asked the question “Why is your company using or
evaluating desktop video conferencing?” the top answer with the 38% of the
responses was “to improve collaboration
among employees”, followed by “to reduce travel costs” with 31% and “to improve
collaboration with partners and customers.”
The main reason for the disparity between room-based and
desktop video conferencing is because the latter was always considered to lack
the video quality of the first, which is partially true. Today, this gap is
closing especially due to technological developments. Solution vendors have
realized that in order to sell video conferencing systems they need to
prioritize image quality while maintaining connection speed.
New solutions available in the market, such as RHUB 6-in-1 web conferencing and remote
support appliance, deliver a high quality service which can match any
room-based video conferencing system, being easier to use and deploy while
being cheaper to implement, requiring little to no maintenance.
As technology progresses and vendors come up with new
solutions it is only expected that not only desktop video
conferencing will catch up with room-based video conferencing, it will
surpass it.